SEC scheduling solution???

sec-football

Seth Emerson shared a scheduling proposal $$ where divisions are done away with and every team keeps four permanent rivals. Given the eight game SEC schedule that would leave four games to rotate between the ten remaining teams in the conference. In that scenario everyone plays everyone over the course of just a few seasons which sounds pretty great to me. As Emerson points out:

Texas A&M is entering its eighth season as a member of the SEC, or at least that’s the rumor, because as someone who covers Georgia I have never seen the Aggies play in person. The two schools have yet to play in football. And while they finally will this November, it won’t be until 2023 that Georgia goes to College Station.

Of course without divisions that leaves us with a conference championship game featuring an already established #1 against a #2 team. Which begs the question – What is the point in playing a championship game when the regular season has already separated out the best team (Looking at you Big 12)? Of course we all know the answer is television money, but that doesn’t make it any less stupid. Then again, I’ve been pretty clear that I believe most conference championship games to be largely a waste of time. It’s just that without divisions they become a guaranteed annual joke as opposed to a probable annual joke, but I digress.

I found myself wondering what Emerson’s proposal would look like on paper so I took the time to work out a rough draft of what each team’s four permanent opponents would (or could) be. These are in no particular order, but here’s what I came up with.

SEC 4-4 Schedule

  • Georgia – Auburn, Florida, Tennessee, S Carolina
  • Florida – LSU, Georgia, Tennessee, Kentucky
  • S Carolina – Georgia, Missouri, Vanderbilt, Texas A&M
  • Tennessee – Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Vanderbilt
  • Kentucky – Miss State, Florida, Vanderbilt, Missouri
  • Missouri – Arkansas, S Carolina, Kentucky, Miss State
  • Vanderbilt – Ole Miss, S Carolina, Tennessee, Kentucky
  • Alabama – Auburn, LSU, Tennessee, Ole Miss
  • Auburn – Alabama, Georgia, LSU, Arkansas
  • LSU – Florida, Alabama, Auburn, Arkansas
  • Texas A&M – Arkansas, Miss State, Ole Miss, S Carolina
  • Arkansas – Auburn, Missouri, LSU, Texas A&M
  • Ole Miss – Miss State, Texas A&M, Alabama, Vanderbilt
  • Miss State – Ole Miss, Texas A&M, Kentucky, Missouri

I basically just kept the current cross division rivals for every team and I believe I was able to maintain all major rivalries. At first glance Texas A&M seems to have a fairly easy go of it in the guaranteed games while Tennessee has a pretty tough slate, although it’s no different that the one they play every year under the current system.

And before any of you get too excited about the prospect of a scheduling overhaul. Here’s Senator Blutarsky reminding us that the SEC doesn’t care about the fans.

The SEC’s real problem now isn’t the schedule.  That’s the symptom, not the root cause.  The real problem is that the conference doesn’t have a financial incentive to work up a fix.  There’s no interest (other than from us fans, of course)

The sad thing is, he’s probably right.

See you at G-Day

-CB

13 thoughts on “SEC scheduling solution???

  1. Tennessee-Kentucky is a thing. Also, Tennessee-UGA does no favor to either. So throw in Vandy to get this right:

    These two rivals games:
    TN-UGA and UK-VAN
    Are changed to:
    TN-UK and UGA-VAN

    Like

    1. I don’t think you’d have many fans on either side who would be excited lose the annual Tennessee game, but I could see Kirby being in favor of that. Especially given that he won’t even bother to wear black jerseys to appease us peasants.

      Like

  2. WHY does everybody think that just because we’re neighboring states makes SC a “sports rival”? We’ve played more games against Vandy & KY than SC!!!

    Like

    1. Vandy is in a neighboring state too. Georgia has played SCe 71 times, UK 72 times and Vandy 79 times. That’s a negligible difference.

      People probably value the SC rivalry more because neither Vandy or UK have won consecutive games against Georgia in the past half century. Just a guess.

      Like

  3. I said I didn’t list Tn.-Vandy playing each other since they’re from the same state which means they WILL be on each other’s list.

    Like

  4. Didn’t say it was an issue. I’m talking about annual games you can basically say KY, Miss., & Ark. will lose practically every time, giving Fl., Ala., Aub., & LSU a “W” before the season starts while our 4 are toss-ups.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s